Historical Sampler – Pink Blossom  

Posted by MeganH in

I did put up a picture of (what I think are foxgloves) but I decided to do these instead because of the size issue. (You’ll see the size in a minute)

raised_design_1

I wanted to do mine in pink. That was ok – I found 1 pink set in the Burrell Collection book, and 3 in ‘Twixt.

Here’s the base of the flower that sits on the ground.

It’s in Soie D’Alger cream silk in long and short stitch with a few split stitches added in.

The base is outlined in black.

raised_2

Here’s the top of the flower, being done with a cordonette in a seperate frame. 3 shades of pink, with the darkest pink as an outline at the bottom.

raised_1

Here are the stitches I need to cut through to free the flower top ….

raised_3

The freed flower top (in a very dark photo), with my stork scissors placed next to it for perspective. If I did the foxglove, I’d have two pieces half this size (vertically) plus a much smaller piece (the calyx). Yikes!

raised_4

And here’s the completed flower, with wool shoved up his bum to give him a nice ‘rise’.

raised_5

The top was attached with black thread, as per the picture (my edging is a bit further in than in the picture)

Thankyou so much to Jeanne W (especially for the tip to leave the last few rows of the top unattached to the ground, so they’d curl) and to Eowyn, both of whom helped me on how to do raised work in general.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 at 6:33 PM and is filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the comments feed .

4 comments

Well done!

March 18, 2009 at 8:38 AM

a flower with wool shoved up his bum. Charming imagery, Megan! :)

March 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM
Melinda  

Very nice indeed!

BTW, Raised back stitch is just be backstitch done over the steps of the ladder, instead of through the cloth. Any stitch can be raised by treating the rungs as if they were the cloth.

Having a hard time replying to your e-mailed comment. Dunno why

March 21, 2009 at 4:26 PM

Melinda

- Thankyou, and - aha!

March 21, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Post a Comment